![]()
But with virtual box, you actually have macOS on a Windows PC. I may, eventually, see if qemu is faster, but that's even more arcane, so it's not likely in the short term.Windows, macOS – which one do you want to use today? On a traditional setup, you’re stuck with one or the other. ![]() In short, it does so much of what I need it to do that the commercial competitors don't have an appeal for me. I sometimes wonder if VMWare Fusion would be worth it, for the raw device support, etc., but I understand that it can be configured in VirtualBox, with patience and Terminal-fu. #Download virtual box for mac for freeFor free (I, too, was tired of the "subscription model" annual upgrade pleas/threats), I really have to try to find a problem with it. #Download virtual box for mac mac osParallels seems to virtualize Mac OS more smoothly. It works well with most Linuxes I throw at it (have had some issues with Linux Mint and video drivers). I triple boot on my MacBook, but may toss that for using virtualized PCs. Two-way clipboard support just works, and the granular control over the emulated hardware (how many cores, how much RAM, what size drive, etc.) makes it sweet for testing system parameters. It's not quite as nice to configure as Parallels, but once it's running it's fantastic. ![]() What can be said has mostly been said, but I'll chime in.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |